Re: SQL - filtering data based on AND condition

    I admit, your posting score is in order of several magnitudes better than mine, but I have had my share of useful answers in this and other newsgroups. At the same time, you have had your share of rantings as well. On the other hand, one of the reasons I do not post that often in this particular NG is that average sence of humor in this group is pretty low, so I think not putting smileys in proper places is after all my fault.

    Look, it takes about the same amount of time and mental effort to type a ranting email about someone being lazy or to give him a "relational division" clue. So why not say something useful and make him do the homework anyway?

    And yes, I do respect people posting in this group, otherwise I would have given this guy an answer right away.

Isaac Blank, just a SQL guy

"Sybrand Bakker" <gooiditweg_at_nospam.demon.nl> wrote in message news:lccsdvou9qc1fo6rrinecsqofoqfbha5ts_at_4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:52:45 GMT, "Isaac Blank" <izblank_at_yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Look how mean all you guys are. Can't you give him at least a clue?
> >Gospar, look up "relational division" in your textbook
>
>
> Sir, did you ever provide any useful answer sofar in this volunteer
> newsgroup. No?
> Please show a little bit of respect of the small bunch of people who
> respond to requests like this one about every day in their free time,
> and who have developed a nose for people who are too lazy to do
> anything on their own. And for the rest: we don't need your rant.
>
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Wed Jun 04 2003 - 13:42:30 CDT