Re: Oracle versus MS Sqlserver 2000: Technical Comparison of the Features in the two databases

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3E6E498F.FA9031B4_at_exesolutions.com...
> Philippe wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:58:05 +1100, "P" <zarathustri_at_a.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Oracle versus MS Sqlserver 2000
> > > -------------------------------
> > > Technical Comparison of the Features in the two databases
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > By Faulkner Kent, USA
> > > Updated by PorusHH, Australia
> > > Version 3.9, March 2003
> > >
> > it is getting boring, surely oracle will be better on some points but
> > this really reminds me of two little boys saying my bike is better
> > than your ....
> >
> > tjeeez grow up
> >
> > Philippe
>
> Those that have a vested interest in laying claim to having the better
> product are the stockholders in the companies and the employees.
>
> The rest of us ought to be looking at our own checkbook balances and not
> be distracted by claims that one toilet paper brand is softer than the
> other.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>

Daniel,

Great advice. Just checked my checkbook balances (sic). They look great. Absolutely no sign of toilet paper claim distractions. Who do you bank with?

theDogz Received on Fri May 30 2003 - 17:34:44 CDT