Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Fact Table Question

Re: Fact Table Question

From: Joseph Wilson <me_at_home.now>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:40:00 GMT
Message-ID: <ARMga.2915$2x2.1215553@dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net>


Oracle version 8.1.7

The column names will not be in order most of the time. I would say that it would only be about 10% of the time that the columns will be in the order of the primary key order.

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3E828AF2.CC7F2F0D_at_exxesolutions.com...
> Joseph Wilson wrote:
>
> > I have a fact table which is composed of 5 foreign keys and one numeric
> > value. Is there any benefit to creating a primary key bitmap index on
the 5
> > foreign key columns together vs just creating 5 individual bitmap
indexes on
> > the foreign keys? I know the primary key will perform the unique
checking,
> > but it seems like the individual indexes will be better used for
querying.
> > Am I missing something? Is there a reason to go one way or the other?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
>
> What version of Oracle?
>
> How often will the queries use WHERE clauses with column names in an order
other
> than the one in the proposed composite constraint?
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Thu Mar 27 2003 - 18:40:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US