Re: SQL Server Worm devastates Microsoft Corporate networks!

Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com> scribbled:

> On 28 Jan 2003 09:23:52 -0800, nobody_at_spam.com drooled and scribbled:
>> In article <JIyZ9.346$Wu1.53360_at_newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
>> "Simon says...
>>>
>>> Look, schmuckboy, it's quite simple:
>>>
>>> Lots of dev machines, running MSDE (cut down SQL server for
>>> developers) or SQL Server = lots of machines not getting patched,
>>> because they're being run by regular developers, not sysadmins.
>>>
>>> The server farms were being run by sysadmins, not developers, and so
>>> were patched -- but got hit by heavy traffic.
>>>
>>> Now do you understand? Or do you want to show your cluelessness
>>> again?
>>>
>>
>> Look, shitboy, it is quite simple:
>>
>> It is not just the development machines at Microsoft that got
>> affected.
>>
>>

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=562&ncid=738&e=10&u=/ap/20030128/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_worm
>>
>> [Microsoft spokesman Rick Miller] acknowledged that some servers
>> were left unfixed because administrators "didn't get around to it
>> when they should have."
>>
>> Take that, shitboy.
>
> Now you did it!! Somebody's paycheck is in jeopardy around here now,
> and it ain't yours!

Must be yours then, Mr. Alda.

Simon Received on Wed Jan 29 2003 - 04:06:30 CST