Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Transaction, Oracle

Re: Transaction, Oracle

From: Galen Boyer <galenboyer_at_hotpop.com>
Date: 17 Dec 2002 13:11:14 -0600
Message-ID: <u1y4gcvl0.fsf@standardandpoors.com>


On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, ootto_at_genese.de wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> we know this from our basicly used database. We use this
> behaviour to do our database updates. The main reason is that
> we can rollback all database modification if the
> update-function run into an error and the user is able to use
> the previous version.

Sounds like you are adding columns to a table instead of rows to a table? That is bad design.

> It is the best thing you can do. Or do you have another idea
> for this ..?!

Redesign what you are doing.

-- 
Galen Boyer
Received on Tue Dec 17 2002 - 13:11:14 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US