Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: licensing $$ comparison to SQLServer?

Re: licensing $$ comparison to SQLServer?

From: Mike Ault <mikerault_at_earthlink.net>
Date: 3 Oct 2002 07:45:38 -0700
Message-ID: <37fab3ab.0210030645.5c6b6b1e@posting.google.com>


I would like to log a "me too" as far as the spread sheet...

Mike
"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:<3d9aaf42$0$8509$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>...
> "Glen A Stromquist" <glen_stromquist_at_nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:9x4l9.7542$bj5.460125_at_news2.telusplanet.net...
> > I sent you the spreadsheet Daniel - let me know if you dont receive it.
> FYI
> > in the end, with our "named user credits", if we were to go 100% oracle at
> > our site we are about $40k ahead becuase of MS's charger per server
> > license. However without the credit the SS are definatly in SQL servers
> > favor, as you will see in the model. This looks at cost only, not any
> > performance, reliability or other issues.
>
> I too wouldn't mind a copy of the spreadsheet if possible.
>
> The only thing I think has been missing from the discussion is that both
> Oracle and MSSQL are available on a per-processor license basis as well.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
>
> ******************************************
Received on Thu Oct 03 2002 - 09:45:38 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US