Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle licensing term "named user"
On Wed, 08 May 2002 10:08:52 -0600, Thomas Gaines
<Thomas.Gaines_at_noaa.gov> wrote:
>All -
>
>In preparation for a discussion with my organization's purchasing
>people, I'm reviewing our Oracle license usage. Long before I
>arrived on the scene here as DBA, my organization purchased a
>license for "100 named users on an unlimited number of servers,"
>to quote our IT manager. I realize that only our Oracle license
>sales rep can definitely answer my license-related questions, but
>before I talk to him, I wanted to hear your opinions.
>
>What exactly is a "named user"? Would each noninternal-Oracle
>process in the v$session view be a named user? Would the use
>of MTS affect the way that we count our named users? What
>about other forms of connection pooling? I'm woefully uninformed
>in this area, unfortunately.
>
>My group delivers web-based maps, using Oracle as the
>back-end repository for the data. The map server makes numerous
>Oracle connections, but they're all as the same Oracle user. If each
>of these sessions can be grouped together as one "named user", we're
>on Easy Street. Otherwise, we may be running up to some licensing
>limits.
>
>Thanks for your time,
>TG
>
One of our customers is the government lottery organisation.
They have 3000 outlets with a terminal, connected to various front-end
systems and back-end systems. None of these terminals has direct
access to the database. On average 3 people have access to the
terminal.
Now guess how many licenses Oracle wants to charge?
a) 4 (the number of backend systems) b) 3000 (the number of outlets) c) 9000 (the maximum number of possible connections)Mind you, this is a contract renewal, and they currently have 4 licenses.
Every individual connection, which includes web connections is considered to be a chargeable "named user"
Regards
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address Received on Wed May 08 2002 - 11:37:15 CDT