Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Why the difference?

Re: Why the difference?

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:33:41 +0100
Message-ID: <3cadb5c5$0$237$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


I'd definitely start as Tom suggests by looking at the size of the redo logs - if they have been left at the default then they'll be woefully inadequate for 800k records.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
"Jon Waterhouse" <jonwaterhouse_at_mail.gov.nf.ca> wrote in message
news:39206c8b.0204050602.6d0bf95f_at_posting.google.com...

> Thomas Kyte <tkyte_at_oracle.com> wrote in message > >Any ideas on what
causes the difference?
> >
> > what size are your logs? are you in archivelog mode?
> >
> > insert into select -- logged.
> > CTAS -- not logged in noarchivelog mode.
>
> Database is running in noarchivelog mode
> >
> > look in your alert for "checkpoint not complete, cannot allocate new
log"
> >
> > is the insert inserting into an indexed table -- if so, the index
maintainence
> > will add tons too.
>
> No index on the destination table.
>
> I'll have a look at the execution plans.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon
Received on Fri Apr 05 2002 - 08:33:41 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US