Re: 16-bit oracle drivers other then Oracle's?

Jim,

Not really very helpful. My company has 80,000 people in it. They are not going to stop advancing other technologies for one program. If someone has something more helpful, it would be much appreciated. Thanks.

JR

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com> wrote in message news:<sxti8.12928$q2.1195_at_sccrnsc01>...
> You would still need the 16 bit sqlnet part which comes from Oracle. What
> you are seeing is the problem with wanting to use an application that does
> not get upgraded when a major technology shift comes in. What people need
> to do in those cases is freeze their entire infrastructure so they don't get
> into this situation.
>
> I worked for a company which was sunsetting a DOS product (they had a new
> windows product) and a select group of clients did not want to upgrade.
> They had to freeze their whole infrastructures to ensure the level (or lack
> thereof) of stability they currently had.
>
> Jim
> "John" <jriker1_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:e6bb5a8d.0203080544.79a7984f_at_posting.google.com...
> > Previously I asked how you could install Oracle 7.3.4 16-bit client
> > driver under Windows 2000 and actually get them to work. I have been
> > able to accomplish this, although the stability is questionable. I
> > think when I install Word 2000, it overwrites something, not sure why
> > since Oracle is 16-bit, and then starts GPFing when you try and make a
> > connection. Does anyone know of any other companies that make/made
> > 16-bit Oracle drivers that may be more compatible with Windows 2000
> > and not so effected by other things that are installed? The 16-bit
> > drivers are required as the application is 16-bit will not be updated
> > to 32-bit. Thanks.
> >
> > JR
Received on Sun Mar 10 2002 - 15:01:12 CST