Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Criteria/Relationship problems in MSAccess97 query on Oracle7 linked table

Criteria/Relationship problems in MSAccess97 query on Oracle7 linked table

From: Robert Gorski <rhaje1_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 4 Jan 2002 13:06:28 -0800
Message-ID: <9869de5e.0201041306.3a3b94c0@posting.google.com>


I am trying to query an Oracle7 table from Access97. My criteria is on a numeric field (LOT_NO) in a large table of production data (LOT_PROD). I'm trying to get all records that have a LOT_NO > 8700. I put ">8700" in the criteria in the Access query, and I get records back starting with LOT_NO 7626. This query used to work perfectly. I figured maybe I had an Access glitch, and tried rebuilding the query from scratch, with the same result.

I logged in to our database server, fired up sqlplus, and ran SELECT COUNT(*) FROM LOT_PROD; and got 9768543, then I ran SELECT COUNT(*) FROM LOT_PROD WHERE LOT_NO > 8700; and got 473235. I know that there should be a valid subset. I also know that the records I'm looking for should have a PROD_DATE of 12/14/01 at the earliest.

I have another table (LOT_DATA) that uses LOT_NO as its primary key, so I set up a relationship in Access between the LOT_NO fields, added the LOT_NO field from LOT_DATA to the query, and tried using that as my criteria. Then end result was odd:

LOT_PROD.LOT_NO LOT_DATA.LOT_NO PROD_DATE

7630             8701             8/27/01
7626             8701             8/27/01
7632             8701             8/28/01
7626             8701             8/27/01
7630             8701             8/27/01
7724             8702             9/7/01
7633             8702             8/28/01
7633             8702             8/28/01
7633             8702             8/28/01
etc...

I tried moving to a different PC and running it from there, with identical results. I'm not sure what to do next. Actually, I'm at a total loss. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Bob
rhaje1_at_yahoo.com Received on Fri Jan 04 2002 - 15:06:28 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US