Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle Minimum Specification

Re: Oracle Minimum Specification

From: vyper <tgga_at_vyper.karoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 20:39:57 -0000
Message-ID: <u2f4q09i7kdl17@corp.supernews.com>

"Frank van Bortel" <fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote in message news:3C271DF9.A0B20165_at_home.nl...
> vyper wrote:
> >
> > "vyper" <tgga_at_vyper.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:u2a25dfimju060_at_corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > "Rick Hanna" <richardhanna_at_dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:qf6V7.23546$4z5.2734201_at_news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> > > > A client has asked me to upgrade his Win2k PIII PC's to a minimum P4
> > > 1.3-1.6Mhz, 20Gb HD, 256Mb RAM in order to run Oracle (no other
> > > > information available). The minimum specification appears strange
given
> > > that it is only a small office with 3 PC's.
> > > >
> > > > What are realistic min specifications for Oracle PC's clients?
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > >
> > > > Rick
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Depends what he expects the amount of data, number of users etc to be.
> > With
> > > Oracle there are 2 things that you can never get enough of:-
> > >
> > > RAM and hard disks
> > >
> > > From memory I think Oracle recommend 22 hard disks to keep I/O
contention
> > to
> > > a minimum. With memory, the more you have the faster it is.
> > >
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Oppes I should have read where it said clint.
> >
> > Min spec for Financials 11i etc is 32mb RAM, P2-300. For 10.7 with
> > Smartclient we tend to use P2-300's with 128Mb RAM. It really depends
what
> > other applications that the client may be running at the same time.
> >
> > Pete

>

> I don't think a 3 PC office runs Oracle Apps...
> Just my 2 (euro) cents
> --
> Gtrz,

>
> Frank van Bortel

Probably, but how many times have you heard 'we just want a small office server and database' and when you set it up you get 'well actually we wanted.......'

Pete Received on Mon Dec 24 2001 - 14:39:57 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US