I agree. For my home network I just upgraded the OS and Oracle works fine.
For a production system at work, I'd do everything as cleanly as possible.
"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message
news:3be19a17$0$13582$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Oracle will work fine after such an upgrade (it did for me, anyway). But
> it's not the recommended way of getting a W2K system. A clean install of
> any MS O/S is the preferred route.
>
> Regards
> HJR
> --
>
> Oracle Resources : http://www.geocities.com/howardjr2000
> ========================================
>
>
> "Chris Boyle" <cboyle_at_no.spam.hargray.com> wrote in message
> news:9rs1cn$9t7r$1_at_news3.infoave.net...
> > Hello all,
> > 8.1.7
> > NT4 SP6
> >
> > Can anyone point me towards any type of documentation about what to
expect
> > if I do an upgrade of the OS to W2K? Would I be better off to remove
> Oracle
> > and format both disk to do a clean install of W2K or can I get away with
> > just upgrading the OS? Are there any gotcha's I need to be aware of? I
> > couldn't find any documentation that addressed this situation but I know
> > someone else must have run into this situation. My home system is set
up
> as
> > NTFS but I think the server at work (I'm not actually a DBA here but I'm
> > working towards it) is still FAT. Can any body provide a little
> > assistance or relate their experience? Thanks
> >
> > Chris Boyle
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 18:49:48 CST
