Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: MS Access usefulness and size restrictions

Re: MS Access usefulness and size restrictions

From: Clive Bolton <alpha_at_remove.wave.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 06:47:34 GMT
Message-ID: <9g5vn8$2lc$1@news.wave.co.nz>

At last, agreement!

Yes, Oracle work tops the Mammon scale.

An interesting "clincher" argument.

Clive

"Daniel A. Morgan" <Daniel.Morgan_at_attws.com> wrote in message news:3B2665E5.2A7E05D5_at_attws.com...
> > Hey, I'm still learning Oracle and bump my head against it every day,
> > but the more I learn about it, the more I like it. I still haven't
> > found a better front end than Access.
>
> Perhaps you should acquaint yourself with Oracle Forms. But keep in mind
 that everything looks terrible
> compared to something you know better.
>
> I have done Access development. Also Paradox back when it was a contender.
 And I hated Oracle right up until I
> learned it. Now I wouldn't go back even for equal pay. And the pay is
 hardly equal.
>
> As I've said before, but some people don't understand, software is not a
 religion ... it is a tool. Like a
> hammer or a wrench. I use the best one for the job ... and remembering
 that it is a job ... the one the
> knowledge of which pays me the most money. You can easily earn twice the
 dollars per hour with Oracle Forms as
> with Access.
>
> Daniel A. Morgan
>
Received on Sun Jul 22 2001 - 01:47:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US