Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: MS Access usefulness and size restrictions

Re: MS Access usefulness and size restrictions

From: Richard H. Rowson <richard_at_rhrowson.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 06:47:44 GMT
Message-ID: <9g719f$lbc$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>

2 gentleman from Oracle for two days apiece actually!

--
Regards,

Richard H. Rowson

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-family_at_home.com> wrote in message
news:K_yV6.159105$p33.3326821_at_news1.sttls1.wa.home.com...

> The people doing the install must have been morons. I have installed
Oracle
> (7.1 thru 8.17)on a variety of platforms, including NT, and never had it
> take 4 man days. The main limitation was how fast the CD -rom drive was
and
> the disk drives on the server. But gee that has more to do with hardware
> than any particular software.
>
> Jim
>
> >
> > Anecdotal evidence from a software house was that Oracle took 4 man days
to
> > install on an NT4 server. SQL Server took 30 minutes. Which one do you
think
> > many clients prefer if they do not need the sheer horse power of Oracle?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard H. Rowson
> >
> >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Jul 22 2001 - 01:47:44 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US