Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: Oracle 8i vs. SQL Server 2000?

Re: Oracle 8i vs. SQL Server 2000?

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:09:50 -0000
Message-ID: <93eri4$co$1@soap.pipex.net>

you appear to have confused reliability with backup.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
"Ban Spam" <ban-spam_at_operamail.com> wrote in message
news:9021A4F31SunnySD_at_24.0.3.73...

> pacland_at_onebox.com (Pacman) wrote in
> <HFy56.3440$fj6.276461_at_bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>:
> [...snip...]
> >My uses would be for home use and also at work, at work, I'd use it for
> >a documentation server. This documentation server would hold literally
> >millions of records and the database would required to be backed up
> >every week.
>
> Within the last month, I've built myself a new home PC.
> I think/hope that I've solved this PC's backup issues by buying a
> motherboard with a built-in RAID controller and by mirroring (RAID-1)
> a pair of 45GB disks. The Raid controller was about $25 (US) more
> than the non-Raid version & the disks were $189 each. Ideally for
> about just over $200 I don't have to worry about backing up Oracle
> or anything else.
>
> HTH & YMMV!
Received on Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:09:50 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US