redo logs and archived redo logs are sequentially written. raid 5 doesn't do
this well.
"Christian Greven" <greven.christian_at_baufeldt.de> wrote in message
news:90qbmg$d4$00$1_at_news.t-online.com...
>
> Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> 90ol0s$1qcsm$4_at_ID-62141.news.dfncis.de...
> > You need at least 4 disks to compensate for the write penalty on RAID-5.
> > Also online redo log files and archive log files shouldn't reside on a
> > RAID-5 array.
>
> Why not. Can you give a reason, please?
>
>
> Bye,
> Christian Greven.
>
>
Received on Fri Dec 08 2000 - 06:14:37 CST
