Re: NT + Oracle = timebomb?

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:49:14 +0100
Message-ID: <970509645.18763.0.nnrp-04.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

Could you expand on the sorts of things that you would consider:

'normal day to day problems'

Different people often have different perception of what constitutes a 'valid' problem.

--

Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site:  http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Jerry wrote in message <0z1C5.2987$bg6.15875_at_news3.atl>...


>Totally False; I worked with two different companies that

>Had Oracle 8.0.5 installed on NT 4.0 with between 50 and

>100 users. Both system were integrated into a larger corporate

>wan with most of the users connecting remotely form other cities.

>While there are the normal day to day problems that any system

>might encounter, I would say that in my experience that Oracle

>running on NT in Rock Solid.

>

>

Received on Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:49:14 CDT