Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: Is Oracle deliberately difficult?

Re: Is Oracle deliberately difficult?

From: Jay M. Scheiner <jxs_at_wolpoff_nospam_law.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:25:15 GMT
Message-ID: <39b66155.930802942@news.erols.com>

No, you are misunderstanding the concept of a transaction & what I am saying. If someone goes into a transaction, performs their changes & gets out (data is consistent) then my report will be correct. This concept has worked fine for non-relational databases for decades. Plenty of big businesses (as in, probably your bank, your insurance company, etc.) still use Cobol on mainframs.

On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:06:53 +0100, "Dasari" <sbabudas_at_ford.com> wrote:

>You are trying to challenge One of the important features of RDBMS, If you
>cannot accept be prepared to see unbalanced accounts (balance sheet), Your
>company will fire you for producing such a report.
>
>



Jay M. Scheiner
Programmer/Analyst
Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
remove _nospm_ from email address
Opinions are my own only! Received on Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:25:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US