Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: DB2 vs Oracle

Re: DB2 vs Oracle

From: Jerry Gitomer <jgitomer_at_erols.com>
Date: 2000/07/23
Message-ID: <20000723.4293500@p200.nodomain>#1/1

        According to my calculator that means the configuration they tested on only cost $14,231,574! DB2 is an excellent product and over the long haul I suspect that DB2 will prove to be the only viable competitor to Oracle at the high end of the spectrum.

        Just thinking, I wonder how many processors and disk drives you can buy for 14.2 million bucks?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 7/22/00, 1:54:08 PM, Hakan <heren_at_home.com> wrote regarding DB2 vs Oracle:

> hi,
 

> I'd like to hear what you think?
 

> eWeek Lab Director John Taschek writes, "IBM DB2* Universal Database
 7.1
> absolutely hammered its competitors with a TPC score of 440,879 at a
> cost
> of $32.28 per transaction, nearly triple the score of the next-fastest
 

> database."
> http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2602510,00.html
 

> time to spend more time on DB2?
 

> Hakan
Received on Sun Jul 23 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US