Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: Re: An Oracle performances question

Re: Re: An Oracle performances question

From: Marco Pinzuti <mpinzuti_at_virgilio.it>
Date: 2000/06/15
Message-ID: <17A2ECC94D244D1178C40005B83A896E@mpinzuti.virgilio.it>#1/1

You say that currently it's considered better to define a default storage clause per tablespace. But that way the problem seems not to be solved whereby: 1- If the default INITIAL EXTENT is quite small respect the size of the table I'm going to create, I risk the table will get split into too many extents 2- If I create a tablespace with a default INITIAL EXTENT and NEXT quite large, the database will surely be highly fragmented as I'm going to create very small tables

However thanks a lot for the first part of your answer.


VIRGILIO MAIL - Il tuo indirizzo E-mail gratis e per sempre http://mail.virgilio.it/

VIRGILIO - La guida italiana a Internet
http://www.virgilio.it/

--
Posted from [216.163.180.10] 
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Received on Thu Jun 15 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US