Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: Diskeeper 5.0

Re: Diskeeper 5.0

From: mkl <mkl_at_ctel.net>
Date: 2000/05/10
Message-ID: <1ZmS4.2522$O2.29330@harpo>#1/1

From my past experience Oracle does not like to have Diskeeper running on drives that
the data files, or any other Oracle files on it for that matter. I was even advised by Oracle not to run it on the
drives that have data on them. I think the problem I was running into were strange locking problems,
and I/O contention. When you created your dbf files both data and indexes you already preallocate
the space anyway, so I was told there really was no reason to defrag them anyway. As far as I know
if you have a lot of table extents, Oracle only supports one way of fixing that, export-import.

Anyway, when I turned off Diskeeper, problems went away, and things got a lot better,

Mike

Alexander Bisset wrote in message ...
>I am running Oracle 8.1.5.1.0 on a Compaq Proliant 6000 NT4 SP6, with a
 raid
>array. Is it safe to run Diskeeper 5.0 on the raid drivers where the Oracle
>datafiles are stored.
>
>Diskeeper manual says raid drives work fine. I was concerned that Oracle
>might get upset if blocks are not on the part of the disk it was expecting.
>Or am I mistaken in thinking that Oracle on NT stores references to
>disk,cylinder,block etc as the rowid?
>
>Any help much appreciated. Is anyone out there doing this? Any problems?
>
>Regards,
>
>
Received on Wed May 10 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US