Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

From: Norris <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 5 Apr 2000 14:38:15 GMT
Message-ID: <8cfj4n$1coc$2@adenine.netfront.net>

In comp.databases.sybase Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2000 01:59:17 GMT, Norris <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote:

>>See the Locking differences between Oracle and SQLServer
>>http://www.microsoft.com/sql/productinfo/transadvantage.htm

>>

> OK, let's give it a try....

> ( - Provides higher accuracy with its "writer-blocks-reader"
> behavior.)

> The example provided of the husband-wife is completely FALSE and
> MISLEADING. It is NOT what ORACLE does.

> ( - Optimizes system resources through the use of dynamic locking. )

> Cripes, what a load of rubbish. When a design decision has been taken
> because it's too hard to write the appropriate code, let's resort to
> the "engine knows better" explanation. Gives it the "aura" of mistery
> all ignorants like.

I think you are Oracle Expert. You will not let your Oracle8i issues one million row-level locks Received on Wed Apr 05 2000 - 09:38:15 CDT