Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

In comp.databases.sybase Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote:

> Offline, I said. I'm not about to give technical info for free.
> There are heaps of lurkers in these newsgroups who contribute nothing
> and suck all. I don't mind the odd direct line to anyone interested
> in more detail, but lurkers can go jump in the lake.
> I'll give you a hint: read again the conditions I described.

>>I think that MS is cheaper when it comes to hardware and software and >>since it is easier to admin it MAY take fewer bodies for that piece.

> Nope. MS is not easier to admin. sql server MAY be easier to admin,
> mostly because it doesn't allow the finer control that ORACLE does.
> No detail, less complexity. Less flexibility too. That doesn't make
> MS solutions (as a whole) easier to admin.

Do you know which version of ORACLE starts to support:

- Procedural Language
- Trigger / Stored Procedure
- Temporary Table