Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

From: Parvinder Singh <parora_at_questone.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 06:41:03 GMT
Message-ID: <38B38033.2011B4C7@questone.com>

workerbee wrote:

> However, if you count in the loss from unexpected and unexplainable crashes
> or downtime, Microsoft is not the cheapest at all.

you got a SOLID point there workerbee :o) !!!

>
>
> --
> the WorkerBee
> http://www.PriceHive.com
> Buy books Online? We compare prices from major online bookstores!
>
> akmal b chaudhri <akmal_chaudhri_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:88k8mt$fmj$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <38ace385$1$8288_at_readdo01.news>,
> > "X X" <X_at_X.X> wrote:
> > > Read 'em and weep.
> > >
> > > http://www.tpc.org/new_result/ttperf.idc
> > >
> > >
> >
> > How about using an OLTP benchmark based on some actual performance
> > studies?
> >
> > http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~akmal/html.dir/citybm.html
> >
> > akmal
> >
> > --
> > [ -- akmal_chaudhri at bigfoot dot com -- ]
> > [ http://www.bigfoot.com/~akmal_chaudhri/ ]
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.

Received on Wed Feb 23 2000 - 00:41:03 CST