Re: MSSQL vs Oracle - Just the facts

From: Matt Randle <NOSPAMmatt_at_imat.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 15:51:03 -0000
Message-ID: <943458640.11996.0.nnrp-04.d4e48d0d@news.demon.co.uk>

How about,

Against SQL,

No cascading deletes
No rowid's
No table sizing

For,

Cheaper
Better admin tools
Free OLAP

It seems to me Microsoft is competing on price only. For alot of systems SQL Server is good enough + the fact that it is so much cheaper means it is making inroads into Oracles market share.

Matt. Received on Wed Nov 24 1999 - 09:51:03 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Yann Chevriaux: "Word, OLE2 and forms"
Previous message: Ataxia: "Re: Cheapest way to learn/use Oracle NOT for profit"
In reply to: Doug Coan: "MSSQL vs Oracle - Just the facts"
Next in thread: Steve McDaniels: "Re: MSSQL vs Oracle - Just the facts"
Reply: Steve McDaniels: "Re: MSSQL vs Oracle - Just the facts"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US