Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: "= null" & "is null"

Re: "= null" & "is null"

From: Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 3 Sep 1999 09:54:20 GMT
Message-ID: <7qo5sc$187m$2@adenine.netfront.net>

Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote:
> Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote in message
> news:7qat7c$rvt$1_at_adenine.netfront.net...
>> Maybe I need to change my question to the difference between "<> null" >> and "is not null".

> "<> Null" Is still a meaningless statement. Is Not Null means there is a
> known value. <> Null would mean is not equal to an unknown value.

"<> Null" is a meaningless statement? So, in any cases, we should never use it, am I right?

--
Have several nice days... Received on Fri Sep 03 1999 - 04:54:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US