Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

From: Dirk Bellemans <Dirk.Bellemans_at_skynet.belgium>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:52:30 +0200
Message-ID: <7otv3t$bu7$3@news1.skynet.be>


Puneet Khanna wrote in message <7nnoid$b0f$1_at_nntp3.uunet.ca>...
>All the products are having the same problem. You will not be able to
select
>a product and say it is perfect.
>See Microsoft products, a very good example. All of us know about the bugs
>in it (all the products) and we all are somehow managing.

This is a lame argument. To quote Plato "You don't need to be a cook to taste that the soup is too salty". Besides, your argument about M$ doesn't hold. I know of at least 1 product that is completele bug-free (edlin... :-).

--
Dirk Bellemans
Modify email address to reply (use .be instead of .belgium) Received on Thu Aug 12 1999 - 02:52:30 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US