Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Good ISQL

Re: Good ISQL

From: Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 30 Jul 1999 01:33:02 GMT
Message-ID: <7nqvce$3av$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>


So, the only solution is to use SQL*Plus?

Chris Weiss <weisschr_at_pilot.msu.edu> wrote: : SQL-Station has some pretty serious memore limitations they have never : overcome. If you have extremely large packages, SQL Station simply bombs.

: Christopher Weiss
: Professional Services Division
: Compuware Corporate



: R. Nightingale <nighr_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
: news:7nl795$6up$4_at_hyperion.nitco.com...

:> This is kind of Apples and Oranges.
:>
:> TOAD is a no-nonsense rapid application tool that's very handy in
: generating

:> simple SQL objects. For most simple projects it can't be beat for the
:> price.
:>
:> SQL-Station is a heavy-duty, multi-user tool. The heart of it comes from
:> Platinum's SQL-Coder. It is now supported by the full might of Computer
:> Associates. It features a repository approach of reuseable objects from
: one

:> project to the next. The last time I used it, it also supported
: SQL-Server

:> as well as Oracle.
:>
:> It's been two years since I've used the SQL-Station product. Platinum had
: a

:> pretty liberal "try before you buy" policy.
:>
:> --rvn.
:>
:> Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote in message
:> news:7njkrb$bdb$1_at_imsp009a.netvigator.com...
:> > Which tool is better: TOAD or SQL-Station?
:> >
:> > --
:> > ===================================
:> > http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/
:>
:>

--



http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/ Received on Thu Jul 29 1999 - 20:33:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US