Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Lite vs. Enterprise?

Re: Lite vs. Enterprise?

From: Terry Dykstra [TeamPS] <no_spam_tdykstra_at_cfol.ab.ca>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 13:05:42 -0700
Message-ID: <3638c9df.0@news.cadvision.com>


Use Personal Oracle, not Personal Oracle Lite if you want to develop locally and move it to the server afterwards.

--
Terry Dykstra [TeamPS]
Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.

Tim Triemstra wrote in message <36389D98.2DE4E9C2_at_pmglobal.nospam.edu>...
>I recently received the Oracle on NT Trial CD and am interested in
>possibly using Oracle for my next major project. I am in no way
>experienced with Oracle (the extent of my relational knowledge is really
>limited to Access or old FoxPro.)
>
>I was curious, what is the development process comparison between Oracle
>8 Enterprise and Oracle Lite? The 'Lite' seems a lot easier to get my
>brain around (not to mention smaller) but I don't want to just learn the
>'Lite' if the work I do isn't EASILY transferable to the enterprise
>server, since the enterwise version would be necessary for end
>deplyment.
>
>So, if I were to start working on 'Lite' to more gradually learn Oracle,
>would I be able to use all that knowledge for dealing with the
>enterprise edition? I indend to use Java code to interact with the
>database so if there is a strong difference I would appreciate knowing
>it now so I could just start with the full version if that's what I need
>to do. Thanks a bunch!
>
>--
>Tim Triemstra ... TimTr 'at' PMGlobal 'dot' Com ... Atlanta, GA
> 'com.timtr.*" Home Page: http://www.mindspring.com/~timtr/
Received on Thu Oct 29 1998 - 14:05:42 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US