Re: SQLSERVER,IIS replaced by LINUX/APACHE/ORACLE?mlml

From: Michel Lee <ae299_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA>
Date: 16 Oct 1998 17:31:04 GMT
Message-ID: <707vso$5qn@freenet-news.carleton.ca>

Thats what I meant, that NT/SQLSERVER/IIS is MORE expensive and not as stable as LINUX/APACHE/ORACLE

...

"Jerry Gitomer" (jgitomer_at_ictgroup.com) writes:
> Hi Michel,
>
> What makes you think NT/SQLSERVER/IIS is a cheap solution?
>
> Yeah, I know that the software is cheap (it is also low cost -- but
> that's another issue), but what is the total cost of ownership? According
> to some of the big consulting firms it costs more to own the Microsoft
> solution than the Linux/Apache/Oracle solution.
>
> Based on my own experience and the comments I have seen and heard I
> expect that the Linux/Apache/Oracle solution will prove to more reliable and
> offer better performance than the NT/SQLServer/IIS solution
>
> regards
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> Michel Lee wrote in message <703hif$nal_at_freenet-news.carleton.ca>...

>>
>>
>>Just wondering,...
>>will NT/SQLSERVER/IIS be replaced by
>>LINUX/APACHE/ORACLE as a cheap solution?
>>
>>btw how much will oracle charge or its s/w when its Appliucation
>>server comes out in Jan1999
>>?
>>--
>>    /-----------------------------------------------/ \--\--\  \-- \-- \--
>>   /             www.ncf.carleton.ca/~ae299        /---\  \  \ \\   \   \
>>  /             ae299_at_freenet.carleton.ca         /-----\     \ \\-- \--

> \--

>> /-----------------------------------------------/

>
>

--

    /-----------------------------------------------/ \--\--\  \-- \-- \--
   /             www.ncf.carleton.ca/~ae299        /---\  \  \ \\   \   \
  /             ae299_at_freenet.carleton.ca         /-----\     \ \\-- \-- \--
 /-----------------------------------------------/

Received on Fri Oct 16 1998 - 12:31:04 CDT