Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Tables Partitioned by Range and Updating Data

Re: Tables Partitioned by Range and Updating Data

From: Brad Murray <BradMurray_at_SeeSigIfThere.com>
Date: 1998/01/06
Message-ID: <MPG.f1c0f5bf6d500ce98985f@news>#1/1

In article <68sbjp$b9q_at_mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net>, sameerm_at_worldnet.att.net said...  

> I am not really sure that ur talking here about Oracle 8 Table
> partitioning.
>
> In case ur on Oracle 7.3 then u can make use of Partitioned Views.

I am still in Oracle 7.3 right now, but I am evaluating this as a reason to switch over to Oracle 8.

> Partitioned views allow u to spread the data from a single table across
> multiple tables. The tables can be queried in a single qurey by using the
> union operator.

Yes, but if you create a view by unioning two tables you will have no indices. I am dealing with potentially millions of rows here so that is not an option.  

> In case ur on Oracle 7.3.x then user the check contraint definition on the
> partition tables to determine which tables might participate in the query.
> The 7.3 optiomizer is smart enought to realized which partition table to
> look into base on the constraint. Note: To enable partition elimination,
> set the PARTITION_VIEW_ENABLED parameter to TRUE in ur database's init.ora
> file.
>
> In case ur talking about 8. I think it could be an over kill since in 8 u
> can split a single table itself into multiple partition based on
> contraints. Each partition can reside in a different tablespace (if my
> understanding is correct, pl. verify) itself. So if u would do an update
> internal it would result in a insert to the destination and delete from the
> origination partition. As u have correctly stated.

Are you sure about this? If that is the case will it be slow if I update the row such that it has to be moved from one partition to the other?

> Partitioning view I guess should keep every one happy in case ur on 7.3 or
> higher. Plus I guess all ur schema's are in the same instance (ur not using
> and dblinks).

It won't keep me happy if it is slow as molasses.



 Bradley S. Murray Princeton Computer Consulting (609) 730-9100  BradMurray(-at-)usa.net Pennington, NJ 08534-3612 Fax: 275-5651 Received on Tue Jan 06 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US