Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: native Oracle-port on Linux -- what would it take?

Re: native Oracle-port on Linux -- what would it take?

From: M Sweger <mikesw_at_dhp.com>
Date: 1997/12/29
Message-ID: <6889k2$77n$3@stronghold.dhp.com>#1/1

Kristian Koehntopp (kris_at_koehntopp.de) wrote:
: Alex Buell <alex_at_tahallah.demon.co.uk> writes:
: >On 18 Dec 1997, Christopher B. Browne wrote:
: >> Give threading six months to solidify under the GLIBC "regime," and we can
: >> provide a somewhat different story...
: >I keep hearing about GLIBC. What's the difference between that and a
: >normal LIBC?
 

: glibc is the GNU C runtime library Version 2.0 (labelled Version
: 6 in Linux because of ELF version number requirements). Unlike
: Linux libc Version 5 it is portable between differen Unices. It
: also has much better thread support and many, many other
: improvements over normal libc. RedHat and Debian are both deep
: in the process of glib'ifiying their distributions and other
: distribution vendors will follow.
 

: The migration process will have a similar impact on Linux as the
: transition from a.out to ELF (new library has many new features,
: old applications will still require the old library installed
: and loaded, selection between libraries is automatic, some
: people will inevitable ruin their system when upgrading by
: destroying critical system libraries and so on).
 

: Kristian
: --
: Kristian Koehntopp, http://www.koehntopp.de
: "3*666 = 1998" -- Bruder 13 auf der Verschwoerungsmailingliste

Hi,

        So does this mean I still need the pthread library to write applications using threads?

--
	Mike,
	mikesw_at_whiterose.net
Received on Mon Dec 29 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US