Re: Is Oracle the worst-documented product of all time?

>2. Actually, there's no such thing as "Oracle"; the range of products
> (server, development tools, CASE, Web, Applications, specialist
> products like video server) is too wide. The accessibility and
> to an extent the quality of the documentation varies between
> products and product areas; e.g. the Unix server documentation
> is fantastic (do you know any other company that can correctly
> document the installation of, what is it, a hundred or so ports
> of its product onto virtually every flavour of Unix

Don't make me #^&*(@!!@#$! laugh.

Where is the Oracle version for BSD Unix? It's only the most popular version of Unix on the Internet. Where is Oracle? NOWHERE! I'm ### apalled that Oracle doesn't have a BSDI or FreeBSD version. It demonstrates their apathy towards the web as a viable platform for development. Even MICROSOFT is running BSDI - but has Oracle got their product running under it? Nope. Received on Thu Jul 24 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT