Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: System and temp tablespace

Re: System and temp tablespace

From: Ari Kaplan <akaplan_at_psycfrnd.interaccess.com>
Date: 1997/04/24
Message-ID: <5jnt7r$3gp@psycfrnd.interaccess.com>#1/1

Priya Tantry <tantry_at_cc.uq.edu.au> writes:
>What are the implications of having the system tablespace and the temp
>tablespace files on the same physical disk. Does that, in any way,
>affect performance?
>Priya Tantry
>University of Qld

If you have enough drives to spread one file onto each drive, that would be the most efficient. However, in most environments this will not be the case.

Putting SYSTEM and TEMP on the same disk will affect performance based on several factors:

  1. The SORT_AREA_SIZE will mostly determine how often the TEMP tablespace is used. If it is sufficiently large, then no temporary segments will be created and thus no problems putting SYSTEM and TEMP together.
  2. How many objects are in TEMP? Most environments will not put any tables, etc in the TEMP tablespace. If this is not your environment, then depending on how much the TEMP tables are used will determine whether or not put the TEMP and SYSTEM togethe on the same disk.
  3. Most SYSTEM activity occurs during instance startup. This is when the data is read and (hopefully) cached in memory. So the largest performance hit when merging TEMP and SYSTEM on the same disk will be when the instance first comes up.

-Ari Kaplan
Independent Oracle DBA Consultant

<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
<-> For 60+ technical tips, visit my Web Page:                    <->
<->                                                               <->
<->              http://homepage.interaccess.com/~akaplan         <->
<->                                                               <->
<->             email: akaplan_at_interaccess.com                    <->
<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
Received on Thu Apr 24 1997 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US