Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Recommended datafile sizes.

Re: Recommended datafile sizes.

From: <fuocor_at_novachem.com>
Date: 1997/04/03
Message-ID: <3343abd2.5651398@news.htw-zittau.de>#1/1

another advantage of smaller datafiles is that recovery time from a corrupted datafile or disk is faster because you can recover a single datafile for a point in time recovery.

Regards,
Richard Fuoco

On Wed, 02 Apr 1997 17:56:07 -0700, mlarson <mdlarson_at_brain.uccs.edu> wrote:

>My vote is for the smaller files. The large files must be placed on
>larger disks, which means one drive head is responsible for more data
>retrieval. A 500Meg file spec is a good one.
>
>Matt
>
>Tim.Middleton_at_health.wa.gov.au wrote:
>
> Hi guys & gals,
>
> I am looking for some comments on the following scenario.
>
> I have a tablespace which is large (about 8Gb). When creating the
> datafiles for this tablespace, Is is better to have, say. 2 x 4Gb
> datafiles or should i have 16x500Mb datafiles.
>
> What are the advantages/disadvantages of each approach.
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> Tim Middleton
>
> PS. Please email me.
> PPS. Also where can i find the FAQ's for this newsgroup. Tar.
>
> Tim.Middleton_at_health.wa.gov.au.
> DMR Consulting Group Australia
> +619 222 4116
>
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News
> ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 03 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US