Re: using the same field to be set in the update query and in the where clause
From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex_at_attglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:22:18 -0500
Message-ID: <oa1t5d$rli$2_at_jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
>> Luuk wrote:
>>> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.
>>
>> “mailbox specification” is a reference to *the* mailbox specification (in
>> RFC 5322), not your personal private idea of it.
>>
>> Besides, it is anti-social behavior to block the private channel of
>> Usenet
>> beforehand.
>>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:22:18 -0500
Message-ID: <oa1t5d$rli$2_at_jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
On 3/11/2017 2:53 PM, Luuk wrote:
> On 11-03-17 20:37, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Luuk wrote:
>>> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.
>>
>> “mailbox specification” is a reference to *the* mailbox specification (in
>> RFC 5322), not your personal private idea of it.
>>
>> Besides, it is anti-social behavior to block the private channel of
>> Usenet
>> beforehand.
>>
> > ah, you wanted to contact me privalty? > about what, if i may ask?
A very good reason NOT to have a valid email address - so Pointed Head CAN'T harass you offline.
-- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex_at_attglobal.net ==================Received on Sat Mar 11 2017 - 23:22:18 CET