Re: using the same field to be set in the update query and in the where clause
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars_at_web.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:23:43 +0100
Message-ID: <1705101.rT2jSnYXjO_at_PointedEars.de>
>> Luuk wrote:
>>> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.
>>
>> “mailbox specification” is a reference to *the* mailbox specification (in
>> RFC 5322), not your personal private idea of it.
>>
>> Besides, it is anti-social behavior to block the private channel of
>> Usenet beforehand.
>
> ah, you wanted to contact me privalty?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:23:43 +0100
Message-ID: <1705101.rT2jSnYXjO_at_PointedEars.de>
Luuk wrote:
> On 11-03-17 20:37, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Luuk wrote:
>>> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.
>>
>> “mailbox specification” is a reference to *the* mailbox specification (in
>> RFC 5322), not your personal private idea of it.
>>
>> Besides, it is anti-social behavior to block the private channel of
>> Usenet beforehand.
>
> ah, you wanted to contact me privalty?
I might want to, and anybody else.
That is why there has to be an *e-mail address* in the “From” header field value, which is something different from what *you* have in *your* From header field value.
-- PointedEars Twitter: _at_PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.Received on Sat Mar 11 2017 - 21:23:43 CET