Re: using the same field to be set in the update query and in the where clause

On 11/03/17 18:38, Luuk wrote:
> On 11-03-17 18:58, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Luuk wrote:
>>
>>> Find a good place to post this code, which i obviously wrong, because
>>> your 1st and 4th parameter seem to get the same value.
>>
>> Unlikely. It is a *prepared statement*.
>
> There is some code which does handle (or 'take care') of this
> preparation ...
>
>>
>> Your From header is borked, see RFC 5536.
>>
>
> i dont see anything wrong with it, because rfc5536 says:
> "The originator fields of a message consist of the from field, the
> sender field (when applicable), and optionally the reply-to field.

sender field should resolve to a valid domain, even if that is '.invalid'

> The from field consists of the field name "From" and a comma-
> separated list of one or more mailbox specifications."
>
> and what i use is a perfectly valid mailbox specification.

-- 
"In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is 
true: it is true because it is powerful."

Lucas Bergkamp