Re: Referential Integrity
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars_at_web.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:25:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1629981.tdWV9SEqCh_at_PointedEars.de>
>
> Thomas,
> Your reply provides no information to the op
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:25:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1629981.tdWV9SEqCh_at_PointedEars.de>
bill wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 9:55 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Stefan Ram wrote: >>> Does the following schema have referential integrity? >> >> Maybe if you had written it easily readable, I might have looked into it >> further. >> >>> […] >>> >>> Observe that the value of the foreign key '1' from table U >>> appears /twice/ in table T. >> >> So what?
>
> Thomas,
> Your reply provides no information to the op
Wrong.
> and is annoying.
A matter of opinion, not fact.
> You could have provided the op the same information by not
> writing a reply at all,
Wrong.
> and have been less annoying.
>
> On the other hand, Jerry's answer was clear, concise,
> informative, and pleasant.
Again, a matter of opinion only.
Why does it not surprise me that you have not commented on Doug Miller’s reply?
Why does it not surprise me that you have not provided *any* information to the OP *at all*?
Score adjusted.
-- PointedEars Twitter: _at_PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.Received on Thu Nov 17 2016 - 16:25:24 CET