Re: Complicated query

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex_at_attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:01:47 -0500
Message-ID: <m65om9$b52$1_at_dont-email.me>

On 12/8/2014 9:58 PM, Shelly wrote:

> On 12/7/2014 9:36 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

>> On 12/7/2014 8:05 AM, Shelly wrote:

>>> On 12/6/2014 12:24 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 06/12/14 17:20, Shelly wrote:
>>>>> I almost always find that a query does it faster than
>>>>> multiple queries with intermediate code....
>>>>
>>>>> .... and I am using Oracle.
>>>>
>>>> 1/. My comments on using intermediate code applied specifically to
>>>> MySQL, not Oracle. In fact I specifically stated if the query was that
>>>> immense, buy Oracle.
>>>
>>> I did not criticize you.  In fact, I thank everyone for their responses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2/. why are you asking in a MySQL group for an oracle compatible query?
>>>
>>> Because when I checked, no Oracle group had active participation whereas
>>> this one did.  Besides it was a SQL question and I thought someone here
>>> might have some idea. There is overwhelming overlap between the two as
>>> far as a query is concerned.
>>>
>>

>> As you found - there is not nearly as much overlap as you think. Next
>> time, please don't waste our time on Oracle questions. This is a MySQL
>> newsgroup. I, for one, wasted a bit of time trying to figure out what
>> you wanted before giving you an intermediate response. Where do I send
>> the bill?

>>

>> And I'm sure others wasted some time trying to figure out exactly what
>> you wanted, also.

>>

>> Oracle has its own support.

> 
> I should have known better.  I was wrong.  You haven't changed one iota.
>  Oh well.
> 

Neither have you, Shelly. Still too lazy to try to find the right place to ask your questions.

I should have known not to waste any time on you.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex_at_attglobal.net
==================

Received on Tue Dec 09 2014 - 04:01:47 CET