RE: Upgrading with no patches in the "base"?

From: <dimensional.dba_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:30:44 -0800
Message-ID: <573501d6e5d3$3c8b9890$b5a2c9b0$_at_comcast.net>



I agree with the why not 19c comment.  

However back to the base question, I have seen lots of COTS vendors test their database upgrade or app against the base install of the database without extra patching.

Really means they are only testing fundamentals of the application against the database version, then they can later deal with possible perf tuning or bug changes later that they of course can simply blame on the Oracle Database and not their SW.

There are lots of applications that on move to a later version of the database that init parameters have to be changed including “_” parameters.

The testing method is to separate the variables

  1. Testing the application against the new database version.
  2. Testing the application against future security patches.

Yes if the patches fail then you have to determine what you are going to do with the app or work SEV1 with Oracle to make security patch and app work together.  

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> On Behalf Of Mark J. Bobak Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 7:28 AM
To: Noveljic Nenad <nenad.noveljic_at_vontobel.com> Cc: mkline1_at_comcast.net; ORACLE-L <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Subject: Re: Upgrading with no patches in the "base"?  

"They will test this for a while, and if everything is fine, THEN they will apply the patch."  

And what if everything *isn't* fine? Then they *won't* apply the patch?  

Doesn't make sense.  

-Mark  

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:19 AM Noveljic Nenad <nenad.noveljic_at_vontobel.com <mailto:nenad.noveljic_at_vontobel.com> > wrote:

Hi Michael,  

That sounds like black magic.  

If “for a while” implies two different maintenance windows, you end up with two test cycles and two disruptions instead of just one. If you get the opportunity to combat these voodoo practitioners in front of the management, the most persuasive argument would be that the database will be running without security and other critical patches for a while. Who’s going to take that risk?  

Last but not least, why not 19c?  

Best regards,  

Nenad    

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> > On Behalf Of Michael Kline Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 15:29
To: 'ORACLE-L' <oracle-l_at_freelists.org <mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org> > Subject: Upgrading with no patches in the "base"?  

Hearing that an application is going to be upgraded from 12.1 to 12.2.  

Vendor is saying they will create a “blank, no patched” 12.2 $ORACLE_HOME, and then upgrade the database.  

They will test this for a while, and if everything is fine, THEN they will apply the patch.  

I’ve never heard of such a thing and have been working on Oracle databases since 1983, version 4.0.  

Is there logic in this? We try to keep all databases at N-1 on patching.    

Michael Kline      


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt, bevor Sie dieses E-Mail drucken.

Important Notice
This message is intended only for the individual named. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee you should in particular not disseminate, distribute, modify or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. Without prejudice to any contractual agreements between you and us which shall prevail in any case, we take it as your authorization to correspond with you by e-mail if you send us messages by e-mail. However, we reserve the right not to execute orders and instructions transmitted by e-mail at any time and without further explanation. E-mail transmission may not be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete. Also processing of incoming e-mails cannot be guaranteed. All liability of Vontobel Holding Ltd. and any of its affiliates (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Vontobel Group") for any damages resulting from e-mail use is excluded. You are advised that urgent and time sensitive messages should not be sent by e-mail and if verification is required please request a printed version. Please note that all e-mail communications to and from the Vontobel Group are subject to electronic storage and review by Vontobel Group. Unless stated to the contrary and without prejudice to any contractual agreements between you and Vontobel Group which shall prevail in any case, e-mail-communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. The legal basis for the processing of your personal data is the legitimate interest to develop a commercial relationship with you, as well as your consent to forward you commercial communications. You can exercise, at any time and under the terms established under current regulation, your rights. If you prefer not to receive any further communications, please contact your client relationship manager if you are a client of Vontobel Group or notify the sender. Please note for an exact reference to the affected group entity the corporate e-mail signature. For further information about data privacy at Vontobel Group please consult www.vontobel.com <https://www.vontobel.com> .

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 08 2021 - 16:30:44 CET

Original text of this message