Re: Re: Does Anybody know this parameter: is_recur_flags

From: <l.flatz_at_bluewin.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:03:49 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <362795756.17672.1604487829282_at_bluewin.ch>





Hi MIkhail,
thanks. Thats probably the reason why I did not find the note. regards
Lothar
----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----
Von : mvelikikh_at_gmail.com
Datum : 04/11/2020 - 11:46 (MN)
An : l.flatz_at_bluewin.ch
Cc : oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Betreff : Re: Does Anybody know this parameter: is_recur_flags  

  Hi,              

    looks like it can not be found in MOS or the documentation.              

  I have found it in the archive:       

  What is the Meaning of the IS_RECURS_FLAGS Parameter? (Doc ID 1611033.1)               

  Looks like a typo in the parameter's name in the MOS article - it should have been is_recur_flags rather than is_recurS_flags.                       

     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
               
                
                 
                  Best regards,
                  
                 Mikhail Velikikh
                
                
                 
                 
                 
                
               
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
   
  
  
 
 

  On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 10:31, Lothar Flatz <   l.flatz_at_bluewin.ch> wrote:       

  Hi,      

 looks like it can not be found in MOS or the documentation.      

 When I try to change it:      

 alter system set is_recur_flags=0 scope=both   

 Error report -   

 ORA-02065: illegal option for ALTER SYSTEM   

 02065. 00000 - "illegal option for ALTER SYSTEM"   

*Cause: The option specified for ALTER SYSTEM is not supported
  

*Action: refer to the user manual for option supported
     

 Regards      

 Lothar   

 --   

  http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l           

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 04 2020 - 12:03:49 CET

Original text of this message