Re: reads by KTSJ
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:50:07 -0400
Message-ID: <129b834c-8e3e-675c-eae5-b2e172970d88_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:50:07 -0400
Message-ID: <129b834c-8e3e-675c-eae5-b2e172970d88_at_gmail.com>
That may be a consequence of disk group re-balancing operation if the database is on ASM.
On 5/13/20 7:28 PM, Tanel Poder wrote:
> But its value was 0 in your environment, so it looks like in your case
> it wasn't a foreground session that hit individual problematic blocks,
> but rather Oracle thinks the whole segment needs to be analyzed &
> repaired for some reason:
-- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu May 14 2020 - 02:50:07 CEST