AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: amm vs. asmm
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:03:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1579860190891.8705149.10874f7dd594c8154b00e94a7c49321739e03fd7_at_spica.telekom.de>
thanks a lot for the information. especially the remark about AIX.
Regards
Ahmed
Gesendet mit der Telekom Mail App
<https://kommunikationsdienste.t-online.de/redirects/email_app_android_sendmail_footer>
- Original-Nachricht --- Von: Stefan Koehler Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: amm vs. asmm Datum: 24.01.2020, 10:46 Uhr An: ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Hello Ahmed,
there are also problems with ASMM, e.g.
https://twitter.com/jolliffe/status/1094195271448186881?s=20
<https://twitter.com/jolliffe/status/1094195271448186881?s=20> .
There is no better way than doing malloc() or mmap() on your own - just
kidding ;-)
I see no reason to change Oracle's memory management if nobody currently
faces any issue. However in general I personally favor ASMM (or completely
manual SHM management) from the start but why changing something that does
work right now in your case. By the way even some guys from Oracle do not
favor AMM in first place, e.g.
P.S.: Moving Oracle away from AIX is almost always a good idea (not just in
case of current problems). IMHO there is only one good reason (real need
for best single thread CPU performance) to stay on Power / AIX - but then
you need to configure SMT carefully and benchmark it as well.
Best Regards
Independent Oracle performance consultant and researcher
Website: http://www.soocs.de <http://www.soocs.de>
Twitter: _at_OracleSK <mailto:_at_OracleSK>
> "ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de <mailto:ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de> " <
https://twitter.com/MikeDietrichDE/status/666564901536727040?s=20
<https://twitter.com/MikeDietrichDE/status/666564901536727040?s=20> or
https://mikedietrichde.com/2016/03/04/parameter-recommendations-for-oracle-database-12c-part-i
<https://mikedietrichde.com/2016/03/04/parameter-recommendations-for-oracle-database-12c-part-i>
/
Stefan Koehler
ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de <mailto:ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de> > hat am 24.
Januar 2020 um 10:11 geschrieben:
>
> hello Steffen,
>
> it is just an observation that we have made in the past. After we heard
that there are problems with AMM (I guess from you too in DOAG :-) ). I did
few performance tests and have very negative impact of AMM on our
application. In addition to that I doubt that the DBA has a factual reason
to use AMM. It was may be only coincidence. Furthermore I'm worried that
someone will look elsewhere for current performance problems. For example,
to believe that the solution is to use a different OS ;-)
> Grüße
> Ahmed
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jan 24 2020 - 11:03:10 CET