Re: 12.1.0.2 ADG Reading 1 block at a time? (TEMP / V$SORT_Segment)

From: Chris Taylor <christopherdtaylor1994_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:34:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAP79kiS82W=YHe4Rtks4xf1FuyYvS=0SWC616y+G=i8=q4QKzw_at_mail.gmail.com>



OOOOH --- Forgot I had thrown that in there. I did that only in my test script last night to see if it was a new transformation and forgot I had that in there this morning.
(Sigh)

That means the plan is bogus as well for that dbms_xplan i pulled out. Gah. Sorry about that.

Let me pull down another one without that in there.

Chris

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:51 PM Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Chris,
>
> The plan looked fine to me.
> One oddity - why do you have optimizer_features_enable set to 9.2.0.8 ?
> That's a bit extreme for a 12.1.0.2 database.
>
> It's also not obvious why the optimizer could manage to choose a nested
> loop at operation 23 when its first child is predicted to have 32M rows and
> its second child is the view at operation 90 that has a cost of 481 each
> time it is re-evaluated. But perhaps that because 9.2.0.8 couldn't do a
> "hash join right outer" and thinks the nested loop outer will be cheaper
> than a merge join outer.
>
> Since you've got the trace file, do you have the bit where Oracle dumps
> the STAT lines so that you can get the Rowsource Operation plan ?
>
> Regards
> Jonathan Lewis
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Chris Taylor <christopherdtaylor1994_at_gmail.com>
> Sent: 22 January 2020 17:26
> To: Jonathan Lewis; Cary Millsap; andy_at_oracledepot.com
> Cc: Oracle L
> Subject: Re: 12.1.0.2 ADG Reading 1 block at a time? (TEMP /
> V$SORT_Segment)
>
> FYI - I formatted that dbms_xplan info as "fixed width" in my reply below
> but I'm not sure if it preserved the formatting when you guys received it.
>
> Chris
> <snipped rest of message>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jan 22 2020 - 19:34:06 CET

Original text of this message