Re: Force specific plan to be used

From: Henry Poras <henry.poras_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:40:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAK5zhL+sbtRNG7hJxhpw4Z+2JAzN=YUM=-1RDMaCVkc9cZeX9Q_at_mail.gmail.com>



Also, nearly all of the time difference is in cpu_sec_per_exec. The elapsed time difference posted above is ~2.5 seconds, 2 seconds of which is CPU.

Henry

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:41 AM Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com> wrote:

> Excellent suggestion.
>
>
>
> Now I haven’t read the full thread yet, but I immediately have 3 questions
> (that may be in there when I dig):
>
>
>
> 1) Parallel query?
>
> 2) RAC?
>
> 3) Force parallel query local?
>
>
>
> A wide variety of hilarity can be seen in RAC parallel query NOT forced
> local on most of 12.1 (and some of 12.2). Hmm actually it can happen forced
> local on 12.1, but I think that at least was patched for 12.2. A symptom of
> the BUG I reference would be either parallel forced to serial (having given
> up trying to get identical FULL HASH on child plans) or a long parse time
> finally getting the matching children to feed to the coordinator.
>
>
>
> That may be a zebra whilst you’re looking for a sick horse, and there are
> a lot of fine responses from the few I’ve read in the thread, so take my
> comment with a salt shaker.
>
>
>
> mwf
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Sayan Malakshinov
> *Sent:* Friday, November 01, 2019 1:23 AM
> *To:* breitliw_at_centrexcc.com
> *Cc:* ORACLE-L; JBECKSTROM_at_gcrta.org; tanel_at_tanelpoder.com
> *Subject:* Re: Force specific plan to be used
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Since OP is talking about adaptive plans with multiple child cursors, I
> would check *FULL_PLAN_HASH_VALUE *and* PLAN_HASH_2. *
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Nov 01 2019 - 18:40:55 CET

Original text of this message