Re: Linux

From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:30:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJvnOJZ67Ac2Da7eAjx4dpW67xWhpnjpz0g11TD2tTHj=YpBKA_at_mail.gmail.com>





I have generally found that OVM is less stable and a harder to manage than other virtualizing software. However, much of that experience comes from using it on ODAs, which are notoriously difficult to manage to begin with, so I may not be the best source of information.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:15 AM Clay Jackson (cjackson) < Clay.Jackson_at_quest.com> wrote:

> I’d agree w/Mladen – I’ve not seen or heard “bad results” from anyone
> running OEL/UEK 7 or RHEL 7 on VMWare or OVM. In many cases, as we talk to
> folks, which Hypervisor they’re running often doesn’t even come up. These
> things are so “commoditized” that it really does come down to:
>
> 1. Where do you have the “best” support in YOUR organization
> (internally and with vendors)?
> 2. What will give you the lowest TCO?
>
>
>
> Good luck!
>
>
>
> *Clay Jackson*
>
> Database Solutions Sales Engineer
>
> clay.jackson_at_quest.com
>
> *office* 949-754-1203 *mobile* 425-802-9603
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Mladen Gogala
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2019 5:28 AM
> *To:* Noveljic Nenad <nenad.noveljic_at_vontobel.com>; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: Linux
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/9/19 8:09 AM, Noveljic Nenad wrote:
>
> Thank you, Mladen – then we’ll start our evaluation with OL7.
>
>
>
> Is there any particular reason why you didn’t mention KVM (
> https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/virtualization/what-is-KVM
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redhat.com%2Fen%2Ftopics%2Fvirtualization%2Fwhat-is-KVM&data=02%7C01%7Cclay.jackson%40quest.com%7C8cfb2d6745724571790608d74cb43bae%7C91c369b51c9e439c989c1867ec606603%7C0%7C0%7C637062209290426975&sdata=sfZYzK3WollywNSgczxyauMXYwOutzN2ZNW7RVAUIm8%3D&reserved=0>
> ) for virtualization?
>
>
>
> VMWare isn’t strategic in our shop. In contrast, we’ve been having an
> absolutely positive experience with Hyper-V for hosting SQL Server, but we
> would like to avoid it for Oracle, as we’d need to deal with yet another
> team, where it isn’t absolutely necessary.
>
> No particular reason. As a consultant, I have most frequently encountered
> the aforementioned hypervisors. I have no experiences with KVM, either
> good or bad.
>
>
>
> Anybody can share their experiences with OVM?
>
>
>
> OVM can pretty much do what all other hypervisors can also do. In
> addition to that, OVM virtual machines can be easily moved to Oracle Cloud
> and Oracle is willing to discount the price for databases is you buy OVM,
> which makes things cheaper for you. Again, those are business reasons, not
> technical reasons. Hypervisor software has reached a level of maturity,
> just like office software. All the office software suites can doc and docx
> documents, export them as PDF and edit styles and fonts. BTW, OVM is KVM
> based.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mladen Gogala
>
> Database Consultant
>
> Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'



-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Oct 09 2019 - 17:30:39 CEST

Original text of this message