Re: To LVM or not to LVM?
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 18:06:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAEX1xDX0j8icQnX+nt8rA0pOszwu7WeCC-hnCWumnuXnfEAW0Q_at_mail.gmail.com>
It´s a great solution
For example, with linux lvm you can resize a volume, or add a new one, doing it online.
Could you evaluate a trial before decide it ? my suggestion..
regards,
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 17:28, Rich J <rjoralist3_at_society.servebeer.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Migrating from AIX to OL7 (x86-64) under VMware with an all-flash SAN, and
> I'm planning out the logical volumes for database filesystems (non-ASM).
> I'm now questioning whether or not to use LVM, even for filesystems. If I
> need to add datafiles without LVM, the Storage Manager adds a new virtual
> disk to the server, and I create a new mountpoint and set security on it.
> Easy.
>
> In AIX with XIV storage, there was a minimum ~17GB allocation per LUN, so
> there was space savings in using LVM to group together small control files,
> redo logs, etc. Not being a vSphere person, I don't know if this is the
> case there as well.
>
> Any opponents/proponents for/against LVM for Oracle database virtual
> servers?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
> p.s. This will be for Oracle EE 12.2 and (hopefully someday) higher
> databases.
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue May 07 2019 - 23:06:35 CEST