Re: After applying PSU to clustered 11g home DB on node 2 cannot start.

From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:51:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEueRAXsnMC4ATLzwhsOOOyaJnzSt3K5d1sVtK79RyYAypeiUw_at_mail.gmail.com>



Tony,

What source are you getting the control file name from?

Remember that clusterware uses the the gpnp profile to determine what parameter file to use to start an instance so the source you are looking at might not be the same as clusterware's source.

Seth

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:45 AM, De DBA <dedba_at_tpg.com.au> wrote:

> Well.. no. That is the other thing that surprises me.. the control file
> has a normal ASM name like +DATA/.. The ASM devices are /dev/dm-* and owned
> by grid:asmadmin, as you would expect.
>
> Yet in the log file the multipath device appears. I would have thought
> that the underlying devices would perhaps be known to +ASM, but why should
> client instances know anything about the underlying devices?
>
> Cheers,
> Tony
>
>
> On 28/04/17 01:12, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>
> Hmmmm, the name of the control file apparently doesn't conform to ASM
> standards:
>
> ORA-15025: could not open disk "/dev/mapper/HDD_E0_S00_372178872p1"
> Can you try with naming the control file like '+DGROUP/dbname/CONTROLFILE/control1.ctl'?
> Your control file has a name of a real multi-path device, which cannot be
> owned by grid:asmadmin. You should use asmadm to check the disk group and
> database for the control file name.
> Regards
>
>
> On 04/27/2017 10:06 AM, De DBA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm applying a PSU to a clustered home for the 1st time in my life and of
> course hit a snag.. This is 11.2.0.4 database on a 2-node ASM (12.1.0.2 )
> cluster on an ODA and I am applying the 11.2.0.4 October 2016 PSU. All
> databases are single-node, just ASM is clustered. I am patching only the
> database homes, not ASM.
>
> I ran opatch on node 1 and it propagated automatically to node 2. Before
> the patch, both nodes had databases running without errors.
>
> Opatch reported no errors on either node.
>
> After the patch, I can restart the databases on node 1 without problems
> and run the post-install actions, but on node 2 start attempts end in
> ORA-205 "Error identifying control file". In the alert log are masses of
> errors like this:
>
> …
>
> Thu Apr 27 23:42:51 2017
>
> ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
>
> NOTE: Loaded library: System
>
> ORA-15025: could not open disk "/dev/mapper/HDD_E0_S00_372178872p1"
>
> ORA-27041: unable to open file
>
> Linux-x86_64 Error: 13: Permission denied
>
> Additional information: 9
>
> …
>
>
> I checked the permissions/ownership of the oracle executable, but that is
> the same on both nodes. The file permissions on the disk devices are also
> the same and ASM has never gone down during or after patching. I'm
> stumped...
>
> Cheers,
> Tony
>
>
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Apr 27 2017 - 17:51:21 CEST

Original text of this message