RE: Memory speed question
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:14:57 -0700
Message-ID: <045401d2aa5b$784a5950$68df0bf0$_at_comcast.net>
Actually testing memory isn't that hard.
I have always told clients to go to the vendor's labs to perform testing so you don't have to acquire the extra memory yourself.
However, in most cases for companies new equipment is arriving every couple of months and you normally can scavenge memory to make a full server to run some tests. You aso can look at your spare parts pool to run a couple of days of testing.
Lots of ways to skin this cat.
I normally use some open source benchmarking SW that represents standard apps and create some stub apps in the languages the client is using. It is fairly straight forward and you can complete testing on 2 days.
Matthew Parker
Chief Technologist
Dimensional DBA
425-891-7934 (cell)
D&B 047931344
CAGE 7J5S7 Dimensional.dba_at_comcast.net
<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-parker/6/51b/944/> View Matthew
Parker's profile on LinkedIn
www.dimensionaldba.com <http://www.dimensionaldba.com/>
From: Tim Gorman [mailto:tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 1:09 PM
To: Dimensional DBA; Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com; 'ORACLE-L'
Subject: Re: Memory speed question
"Your mileage will vary" and "it depends" are always 100% accurate, but that does not make them useful.
Its generally correct to advise testing, but benchmarking memory access is a big task, and anyone holding a title like "architect" should expect to substantiate.
On 3/31/17 13:52, Dimensional DBA wrote:
The information about going from 1600MHZ to 1066MHZ is in the Intel and HW documentation relative to Intel architecture.
I have benchmarked systems with a variety of different applications java, python, perl, databases etc.
The "your milage will vary" is of course very accurate. The performance differential to the app in some cases was very low and in other cases was up to 40% differential.
Depends on your app and what the app is doing.
Matthew Parker
Chief Technologist
Dimensional DBA
425-891-7934 (cell)
D&B 047931344
CAGE 7J5S7 Dimensional.dba_at_comcast.net
<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-parker/6/51b/944/> View Matthew
Parker's profile on LinkedIn
www.dimensionaldba.com <http://www.dimensionaldba.com/>
From: Tim Gorman [mailto:tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 12:33 PM
To: Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com; Dimensional DBA; 'ORACLE-L'
Subject: Re: Memory speed question
Amir,
I'd recommend pushing hard for concrete information: a KB or support documentation from Cisco. Lacking substantiation, it's just an opinion.
Don't allow hearsay, opinions, and myths to propagate without challenge. Be respectful, be polite, but be firm.
Hope this helps...
-Tim
On 3/31/17 13:08, Hameed, Amir wrote:
For that we will need to buy memory and then add it to the host which is what we are trying to avoid. We have also asked our data center to check with Cisco and the response we got was that "mileage will vary".
From: Dimensional DBA [mailto:dimensional.dba_at_comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 3:01 PM
To: Hameed, Amir <mailto:Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com> <Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com>;
'ORACLE-L' <mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org> <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Subject: RE: Memory speed question
It is simplest to run a benchmark and you will see that your app will notice a difference if you have a low latency app.
It also limits the overall amount of work that can be accomplished on that blade.
Matthew Parker
Chief Technologist
Dimensional DBA
425-891-7934 (cell)
D&B 047931344
CAGE 7J5S7 Dimensional.dba_at_comcast.net
<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-parker/6/51b/944/> View Matthew
Parker's profile on LinkedIn
www.dimensionaldba.com <http://www.dimensionaldba.com/>
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Hameed, Amir
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 11:55 AM
To: 'ORACLE-L'
Subject: Memory speed question
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 31 2017 - 22:14:57 CEST